Radiometric dating human history Emo online sex cams

Rated 3.93/5 based on 954 customer reviews

The discrepancies between the rejected and accepted data are arbitrarily attributed to excess or loss of argon.[1] Radiometric Dating Indicates different ages by different methods “Rejected and accepted data”? In other words scientists are saying they themselves will not accept some data from radiometric dating because they believe it to be wrong. You would expect your weight would be the same regardless of the method the device used to quantify your weight.

Additionally they know that different methods of dating are providing different ages. So within a narrow tolerance of a few ounces or perhaps a pound or two, a spring scale should provide the same weight as a balance scale (like what you might see in physicians’ offices), which should provide the same result as an electronic scale.

Radiometric dating regularly gives different ages for the same object based on the method used.

For example check the variance in ages from samples tested by two different methods.

In fact you may have already noticed a number of dead give aways in the above description of the hard science parameter specifications of aircraft performance above.

Those give aways are words like: Precisely quantifying aircraft performance is all about knowing conditions and circumstances.

On the other hand, would I bet my life on the supposed age of a rock, or fossil based on radiometric dating and the testimony of some Ph D scientists?

Given all the needed factors (and pilots are required to know them and plan for them before every flight) a pilot can accurately predict the performance of his aircraft so he can determine whether he can safely take off and conduct the flight. The Science and Guesswork of Radiometric Dating The science Age is not a quantity that can be directly measured. It’s science and many believe “science” to be synonymous with “always true” and therefore don’t question the data given, even when it contradicts the Bible – which also claims to be always true in information that it affirms.So when the two contradict – as they do with the age of the universe and the earth – many abandon the faith and reject the Genesis account because current science tells them that the universe and the earth is billions of years old, and disregard the biblical account – which indicates an age of about 6,000 years.Why is there so little confidence in the outcome of radiometric dating that scientist admit that they regularly reject data provided by that means?All you need to do is compare the methodology of radiometric dating with that of predicting aircraft performance and the answer becomes perfectly obvious.

Leave a Reply